ABSTRACT
Immunosuppressive drugs are used for treating coronavirus disease 2019COVID-19pneumonia. This study examined the current status of screening and monitoring patients with COVID-19 pneumonia treated with immunosuppressive agents for hepatitis B virusHBVreactivation. Of 123 patients whose hepatitis B surface antigen level was measured, 2 were HBsAg-positive. Antihepatitis B core/surface antibodies were measured in all 121 HBsAg-negative patients. HBV DNA was measured in 31 of 32 patients who were positive for either or both antihepatitis B core/surface antibodies. Of 34 patients requiring regular monitoring, only 4 were monitored. The HBV monitoring rate at the initiation of COVID-19 treatment was high. How-ever, HBV monitoring after COVID-19 treatment was difficult because most patients were transferred to other hospitals or had their treatment terminated.Copyright © 2022 Takeshi Matsui et al.
ABSTRACT
The patient presented with fever and appetite loss. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a moderate grade 2 pneumonia. Besides, further blood examination showed his HB antigen as negative, anti-HBs/c anti-body as positive, and HBV DNA level as 1.0 LIU/mL. Therefore, he was diagnosed with COVID-19. Administered treatments comprised oxygen inhalation and steroid therapy, including pulses, remdesivir, and baricitinib, which improved pneumonia. Interestingly, one month posttreatment, his HBV DNA level in-creased to 1.4 LIU/mL, followed by a further increase to 1.7 LIU/Ml, showing an improvement. Tenofovir alafenamide fumarate was thus administered. In clinical practice, immunosuppressive therapy is used for patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 pneumo-nia. However, close attention should also be paid to the elevation of blood HBV DNA levels during and after treatment.Copyright © 2022 The Japan Society of Hepatology.
ABSTRACT
Background: Hepatic manifestations of COVID-19 are prevalent in individuals infected with viral hepatitis type B (HBV). Objectives: The current study aims to determine the extent of the HBV reactivation depending on the immune impact on patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Materials and Methods: One hundred forty-one hospitalized cases were divided into patients infected with HBV with/without SARS-CoV-2 diagnosed by automatic fluorescent immunoassay system COVID-19 Ab (IgM/IgG). Next, HBV reactivation was assessed using hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), HBcAb (IgM), HBeAg, and HBeAb ELISA test. Results: The results showed significant differences in HBV reactivation patients with SARS-CoV-2 at P 0.05. Out of 141 HBV patients, 115 (1, 80, and 34) had positive COVID-19 in IgM, IgG, and IgM with IgG, respectively. The results of reactivation test showed 34.07% of patients have HBV reactivation. Conclusions: The HBV reactivation patients had been recorded in acute and chronic cases of HBV patients, where no severe cases were recorded compared with the advanced cases of the disease who received immunosuppressive therapy and biological treatment. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the special care of persons exposed to infection with SARS-CoV-2 to patients infected with viral hepatitis, in particular, advanced cases of the disease and their stages of treatment as it leads to liver dysfunction and life-Threatening complications. © 2022 Medknow. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
The cytokine storm from the evolution of severe cases of COVID-19, requiring strong immunosuppressive therapies, has raised the issue of reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections in these patients. An analysis of the first observational studies in patients with COVID-19 and immunosuppressive therapy and HBV infection along with special clinical cases was presented, as well as personal experience on a series of cases (a group of 958 patients with COVID-19), compared with the analysis of studies performed on patients with HBV infection that underwent biological therapies for psoriasis and personal experience (a group of 81 psoriasis patients treated with biological therapies). Clinical studies have revealed that HBV reactivation in patients undergoing biological therapies for psoriasis, can be prevented with monitoring and treatment protocols and thus, these therapies have been demonstrated to be safe and effective. In COVID-19, immunosuppressive therapies are short-lived but in high doses, and the conclusions of clinical trials are contradictory, but there are published cases of HBV reactivation, which requires a unitary attitude in the prevention of HBV reactivation in these patients. An algorithm was presented for monitoring and treatment of HBV infection for patients with psoriasis treated with biological therapy and the conditions when this protocol can be used for patients with COVID-19 and immunosuppressive therapy.
ABSTRACT
Reactivation of overt or occult HBV infection (HBVr) is a well-known, potentially life-threatening event which can occur during the course of immunosuppressive treatments. Although it has been described mainly in subjects receiving therapy for oncological or hematological diseases, the increasing use of immunosuppressant agents in non-oncological patients observed in recent years has raised concerns about the risk of reactivation in several other settings. However, few data can be found in the literature on the occurrence of HBVr in these populations, and few clear recommendations on its management have been defined. The present paper was written to provide an overview of the risk of HBV reactivation in non-neoplastic patients treated with immunosuppressive drugs, particularly for rheumatological, gastrointestinal, dermatological and neurological diseases, and for COVID-19 patients receiving immunomodulating agents; and to discuss the potential strategies for prevention and treatment of HBVr in these settings.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM: To investigate the risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients undergoing long-term tocilizumab therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. METHOD: From January 2011 through August 2019, a total of 97 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. Clinical data, comedications, and the occurrence of HBV reactivation were recorded. RESULTS: Seven patients were HBsAg+ (7.2%), 64 were HBsAg-/HBcAb+ (65.9%), and 26 were HBsAg-/HBcAb- (26.8%). The median disease follow-up time was 9 years. TCZ was administered for a median of 29 months. Four patients (4.1%) experienced HBV reactivation after tocilizumab therapy. Of the 7 HBsAg+ patients, 4 received antiviral prophylaxis and had no HBV reactivation; the remaining 3 patients did not receive antiviral prophylaxis, and all 3 (100%) experienced HBV reactivation and hepatitis flare-up. Hyperbilirubinemia occurred in 2 of these 3 patients, with mild prothrombin time prolongation in one. After salvage entecavir treatment, all patients had a favorable outcome. Of the 64 HBsAg-/HBcAb+ patients, only one became positive for serum HBV DNA (2.5 × 107 IU/mL) after 18 months of tocilizumab treatment (1.6%; 1/64). This patient was immediately treated with entecavir, which prevented hepatitis flare-up. CONCLUSIONS: Tocilizumab is widely used in treating rheumatoid arthritis and has the potential to reduce the mortality rate among severe COVID-19 patients. However, HBV reactivation needs to be considered. HBsAg+ patients have a high risk of HBV reactivation, which could be prevented by antiviral prophylaxis. Although the risk of reactivation is low in HBsAg-/HBcAb+ patients, strict monitoring is necessary.